Warming May Make Hurricanes Weaken More Slowly After Landfall

Waves smash in the New Orleans, Oct. 28, 2020, landing of Hurricane Zeta.

(The New York Times / Edmund D. Fountain)

While investigating the impact of climate change on hurricanes, scientists focussed on the frequency of storms on the water as the ocean chips and builds up and reinforces heat and moisture.

However, a recent report explores what occurs when hurricanes land and operate within.

The investigation indicates that during this period of their lives climate change impacts hurricanes as well, allowing them to weaken slower and to become violent longer.

The results may have ramifications for the readiness of emergency agencies for post-landfall storms.

Register for the New York Times newsletter

The research was reported in Nature on Wednesday. It examined details of North Atlantic hurricanes arriving in Japan from 1967 to 2018 on the strength or wind velocity decrease of storms the first day after the effect of the land from Lin Li and Pinaki, Chakraborty.

They discovered that, 50 years ago, a conventional hurricane in the first 24 hours, whether it could fly inland for several hundred miles, lost more than three quarters of its strength.

Chakraborty said in an interview, "The downturn has eased significantly over the past 50 years.

"A climatic connection may very well occur."

When contrasting decline estimates with increases in temperature in the surface of the oceans and then with hurricane photos on the ground, they discovered how they said the link was: increasing ocean warming temperatures allow storms to steadily weaken, even when storms are heading away from the source of humidity.

The scientists warned of alerts of inquiries, including the usage of a comparatively limited data set; just seventy-one hurricanes landed over five decades.

Kerry Emanuel of the Massachusetts Technology Institute, a renowned hurricane expert, said he was suspicious of the results.

In his email address, Emanuel claimed that he disagreed with the theoretical claim of the researchers and that the evidence and simulations "while suggestive, do not indicate that decay in warmer climates is slower, regardless of other variables such as storm intensity.".

But the report was persuasive and a modern area in hurricane science — their action over ground, according to other experts.

Also damaged, storm winds will overturn trees and lines, destroy residences, and trigger inland devastation.

The study was "definitive in finding a problem almost no one has thought of and may be really interesting" by Dan Chavas, an Atmospheric scientist at Purdue University, who published an article that follows the Nature report.

Suzana Camargo, a Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory hurricane researcher in the Columbia University , told her and her colleagues last year that stronger hurricanes triggered greater precipitation during landfall.

She said in the new report, "They suggest the humidity is in a storm for a while and that makes perfect sense from the studies we saw."

A hurricane is mainly a heat motor and moisture from the warm ocean powers a revolving wind.

The idea is that if you exhaust the supply of power, friction with land allows you to slow down. The hurricane after landfall weakened.

It was compared to a whirling taste of tea by Chakraborty.

"You're always stirring tea over the ocean and there's a moisture source for the heat generator," he said.

However, as the supply reaches earth, the strain ceases and the friction dies down.

"Much of the slowering mechanism is not the thermodynamics," he said in principle.

But the moisture in the storm is a thermodynamic position, influencing the pace at which the storm weakens. What his co-authors do indicate.

More precipitation persists in the hurricane in a tropical climate, with colder sea surface temperatures.

"According to Chakraborty the relation with the atmosphere becomes clear once we realize that humidity plays a major role.

They checked the theory that moisture plays a role in producing "dry" hurricanes that have dropped apart considerably more easily than regular ones, without some moisture.

They also helped them to evaluate the lesser position in the decline of storms in factors such as topography and weather inland.

One possible flaw in the analysis was that the models used were inherently basic. Camargo said.

After landfall, it is impossible to model hurricanes, she added.

"This is a complicated problem.

There's a lot that the models would capture, for example, the contact with topography.

"The perfect way of portraying landfall hurricans I don't know whether what they did in the model," Camargo said.

"It seems to be in harmony with their theory, at least in this model."

Chakraborty said that there was no disappointment that the results were somewhat skeptical.

"Overall, the problems of our research were widespread theories regarding hurricane decay," he added.

"I hope that this would inspire more study and shed fresh light on this critical field which is well known for a long time."

In the New York Times, this article was originally written.

The New York Times Company © 2020.