Organized programs help prevent or delay diabetes

Organized programs assist prevent or delay diabetes

By Kathryn Doyle

(Reuters Health) – Organized diet & exercise programs can stave off diabetes for those at risk, according to a new recommendation.

The Community Preventive Services Task Force, an independent, unpaid group of public health & prevention experts who develop recommendations for community health, commissioned a review of 53 studies describing 66 combined diet & physical activity promotion programs. The studies were done between 1991 & 2015.

p> The Task Force found strong evidence that these programs are effective at reducing the number of new cases of diabetes, according to a report in Annals of Internal Medicine.

“If you exercise & eat better, you’ll reduce your risk of developing diabetes,” said Dr. Patrick L. Remington, coauthor of the recommendation statement on behalf of the Task Force. “But if you simply tell somebody to eat better & exercise, that does not work.”

The diet & exercise promotion programs included providers or trained laypeople working directly with participants for at least three months, providing counseling, coaching & support over multiple sessions.

Some moreover included specialists like nutritionists, physiotherapists, individually tailored diet & exercise programs & specific weight-loss goals.

The programs were targeted to teens & adults with “pre-diabetes,” marked by elevated blood sugar levels that were not yet high enough to be diagnosed with type 2 diabetes.

“In general, people who may be at increased risk for diabetes (both adults & children) include those who are overweight or obese & those who have a sedentary lifestyle,” Dr. Ethan Balk of Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island, lead author of the evidence review, told Reuters Health by email.

The review found that community-based programs helped improve weight loss, lower blood sugar & reduce the risk for a after diabetes diagnosis. Some moreover reduced blood sugar & improved cholesterol markers, & none reported any long-term harms related to the programs.

In an economic assessment, the Task Force moreover found that these programs are cost-effective. Half of participants paid less than $653 to take part, & costs were lower for group-based or primary-care based programs.

“This is more cost effective than most of what we do in medicine, yet not cost saving, it does cost something,” Remington said by phone. “But the return for those costs are many years of healthy life gained, so we consider it cost effective.”

Gyms & health clubs already offer these types of programs for a modest fee, he said.

It’s “shocking,” he added, “that we are not doing it as a routine part of the health care system. We’ve designed a healthcare system to treat sick people, not to prevent disease.”

The first step may be a alter in providers’ attitudes, he said, noting that many doctors do not believe that diabetes can be prevented through lifestyle changes.

“I think that the medical community has been so influenced by long term secular trends that they’ve lost confidence in the individual to treat themselves through lifestyle changes,” he said.

Then the insurance & outreach system needs to change, & training laypeople or nonphysician specialists to provide these programs should increase, he said.

“The (Affordable Care Act) doesn’t really cover these type of intense prevention programs,” Remington said. “Generally we’ve left people alone with advice.”

There are National Diabetes Prevention Program resources in every state, & the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention has a registry of recognized programs & a “Find a program near you” function (link here: http://1.usa.gov/1vj7p00), Balk said.

SOURCE: http://bit.ly/1M6ih8z, http://bit.ly/1HrtBWf & http://bit.ly/1gxcvQh Annals of Internal Medicine, July 13, 2015.

Task ForceAnnals of Internal Medicinetype 2 diabetes

Source: “Reuters”

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS