A new, extremely precise measure of Avogadro's number, a fundamental constant, could ensure solid footing for a new definition of the kilogram that does not rely on a single hunk of metal sitting in France.
Every junior high school chemistry student learned Avogadro's number, or 6.022 X 10 ^23, a huge value that dwarfs the number of stars in the universe. Because Avogadro's number defines how many atoms or molecules are in a mole of matter, each mole of a substance weighs a different amount depending on the substance in question. So, a single mole of water would weigh just 0.56 ounces (16 grams), while a mole of lead would weigh approximately 7.3 ounces (207.2 grams).
Scientists have tried to precisely measure Avogadro's number in the past, each time using a single silicon ball that weighs 2.2 pounds (1 kg). Because silicon crystallizes into a lattice with eight atoms for each repeating unit of the lattice, they can obtain at Avogadro's number by measuring the volume of each cubic cell. By knowing the ratio between the volume of the crystal & the volume each silicon atom occupies, the team can then deduce how many atoms are in the tiny sphere. [The 9 Most Massive Numbers in Existence]
p> In a new study, researchers calculated Avogadro's number with less than 20 atoms per billion uncertainty, an improvement from the 30 atoms per billion uncertainty they calculated in 2011, the team reported this week in the Journal of Physical & Chemical Reference. By correlating the two values & then averaging the result, the team came up with an even more accurate value of Avogadro's number â€” 6.02214082(11)x10^23, where the (11) represents the uncertainty.
Enter the kilogram
That, in turn, could assist scientists define the kilogram. Right now, scientists define the kilogram based on a physical platinum-iridium ball in the International Bureau of Weights & Measures in France. But this tiny hunk of material may experience small changes in its mass as chemicals react with its surface.
Instead, scientists want to define the kilogram based on a fundamental constant of nature. In 2018, physicists plan to define the kilogram in terms of Planck's constant, a constant that relates to the fundamental action of particles on a quantum scale.
"The absence of technologies to redefine the kilogram is the biggest impediment to a redefinition of the whole system of measurement units, which is expected to deliver even more solid foundations & reliability to precision measurements & to set the stage for further innovations in technology & science," Giovanni Mana, one of the lead researchers on the new paper, said in a statement.
However, scientists can't rush into a new definition.
"Prior to redefining the kilogram, we must demonstrate that the new realization is indistinguishable from the present one, to within the accuracy of the world's best balances," Mana said. "Otherwise, when changing from the present definition to the new one, all users in science, industry, & commerce must alter the mass value of all the existing artifacts."
In order to make sure that the new standard fits seamlessly with the old one, they have to make sure that Planck's constant is incredibly precise. Avogadro's number, in turn, can be used to derive Planck's constant, creating a check on the new value of Planck's constant, Mana said.
Follow Tia Ghose on TwitterÂ and Google+.Â FollowÂ Live Science @livescience, FacebookÂ & Google+. Original article onÂ Live Science.
Twisted Physics: 7 Mind-Blowing Findings Tiny Grandeur: Stunning Photos of the Very Small What's That? Your Physics Questions Answered Copyright 2015 LiveScience, a Purch company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Avogadro's number