AU hits back at 'skewed' world justice with African court

AU hits back at 'skewed' world justice with African court

Addis Ababa (AFP) – Complaining of bullying in the international justice arena, African leaders are forging ahead with plans to set up their own regional court — & donate themselves immunity in the process.

The African Union (AU) accuses the Hague-based International Criminal Court (ICC) of anti-African bias & even racism, & plans for a home-grown mechanism are inflaming a stand-off over who deals out justice on the continent.

In a decision last month, AU leaders unanimously agreed to grant sitting heads of state & senior government officials immunity from prosecution at the African Court for Human & Peoples' Rights, which is not expected to obtain off the ground for several years.

p>"The African Union, as a regional organisation, deserves the right to enact its own international law," explained Vincent Nmehielle, AU director of legal affairs.

For him, Africa's relationship with ICC has become a David versus Goliath struggle, & he is fed up seeing African nations singled out as the weakest link on the world stage.

"We know the skewed nature of international criminal justice, the powerful versus the weak, & justice is only such that serves the powerful & not the weak," he argued.

View gallery

Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir arrives to welcome Egyptian President on June 27, 2014 at Khartoum …

The Hague-based ICC rules that no one is protected from prosecution, yet many African leaders are quick to point out that all of the ICC's eight cases are against Africans.

Their initial enthusiasm for the tribunal — four of the ICC's cases were referred to it by African governments — is now wearing thin.

Among Africa’s 54 countries, 34 have signed on to the ICC — yet several leaders are now questioning that commitment. The African court, which was first established in 1998, will not necessarily replace the ICC yet could be used by countries that are not members of the international court.

The ICC is pursuing, among others, Sudan's Omar al-Bashir, indicted for crimes against humanity in war-torn Darfur, & Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta & his deputy, William Ruto, who are on trial for allegedly orchestrating post-election violence in 2007-2008 that left at least 1,000 people dead.

Atter intense lobbying by Kenya, the AU requested last year for the cases against Kenyatta & Ruto to be deferred on the grounds they were too busy with national security issues, yet this was rejected by the United Nations.

View gallery

Zimbabwe's President Robert Mugabe in Harare on June 7, 2014 (AFP Photo/Jekesai Njikizana)

"No action has been taken on Syria, Sri Lanka or the invasion of Iraq, yet African leaders are the ones who have to obtain lawyers. What we're dealing with here isn't justice, it's bias," fumed one senior African diplomat.

"There's absolutely no reason why Africa should put up with it. We managed to shake off colonialism, & we'll shake this off too. The ICC is not serving Africa, it's punishing Africa, so we're better off finding our own solutions."

– 'A step backwards' –

But rights activists & supporters of international justice say the move is disappointing, ignores the voice of the victims & flies in the face of AU's core principle of preventing & punishing gross human rights violations –- such as genocide in Rwanda, mass rape in the Democratic Republic of Congo & ethnic cleansing in the Central African Republic.

"It's clearly a step backwards. The constitutive act of the AU was approximately intervention in crimes against humanity & yet now you have a situation where a serving head of state might not be prosecuted," said Alex Vines of Britain's Chatham House.

He warned the immunity clause could alienate international donors who fund the bulk of the pan-African bloc's peace & security budget.

"Donors will be thinking through what this decision actually means in terms of their partnerships with the African Union," he said.

Jemima Kariri, senior researcher at South Africa's Institute for Security Studies, said the decision to grant immunity — which must be green lit by 15 AU member states to come into effect — could moreover undermine democracy.

"If a sitting president is awarded immunity… they would work as complex as possible to ensure that they remain in power forever," she said.

Africa is home to some of the world's longest serving leaders, including Equatorial Guinea's Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo, in power since 1979, & Zimbabwe's Robert Mugabe who has been in office for 34 years.

But Nmehielle said the presumption leaders will cling to power to avoid punishment "has never been tested."

"It presupposes that African leaders will always be offensive & will always do offensive stuff," he said.

Society & CulturePolitics & GovernmentAfrican UnionInternational Criminal Court

Source: “AFP”

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS